4.7 Article

What contributes more to life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of farm produce: Production, transportation, packaging, or food loss?

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105945

关键词

Waste; Plastics; Fruits; Vegetables; Logistics; Retail

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1739676]
  2. Directorate For Geosciences [1739676] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  3. Division Of Earth Sciences [1739676] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Food production and supply systems are major contributors to climate change, with food loss exacerbating the issue. A model was developed to estimate greenhouse gas emissions from the entire food cycle, revealing that consumer stage contributes most to food loss. Alternative packaging options and reducing consumer-level food loss can significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions for various produce.
The food production and supply systems are some of the biggest contributors to climate change, and food loss from the entire food chain aggravates the problem. We developed a model to estimate the GHG emissions from the entire food cycle (production, packaging, transportation, refrigeration, and waste management), and applied it to cherries, onions, and plums, the first time these produce have been assessed comprehensively in the United States. We pulled into the analysis 6 additional fruits and vegetables for which California accounts for more than 50% of U.S. production and which we have assessed at least partially earlier: strawberries, avocados, lemons, celery, oranges, and tomatoes. We assessed uncertainty for 34 parameters through Monte Carlo simulation. The total life-cycle food losses for one unit of cherries, onions, and plums produced are 66%, 57%, and 44%, respectively. The consumer stage contributes most of the food loss for eight of the nine produce. The results show that food loss contributes 19-61%, transportation 14-46%, packaging 11-31%, and farm production 7.7-30% to the total emissions. Alternative packaging was also explored. Polyethylene produce bags substituted with PLA bags can lower the total food-loss-inclusive emissions by only 7%, 5%, and 4% for tomatoes, oranges and onions, respectively. Forgoing retail-provided PE bags for produce that are not pre-packaged could reduce total GHG emissions by 12%, 10%, 6%, 6%, and 4% for one unit of tomatoes, onions, lemons, plums, and oranges, respectively. The GHG emissions for the 9 produce can be significantly reduced by decreasing consumer-level food loss. For tomatoes and onions, more than half of the emissions due to food loss can be offset by forgoing packaging at the retail stores.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据