4.7 Review

Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste with municipal solid waste leachate: A review and prospective application with more benefits

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105832

关键词

Food waste; Municipal solid waste leachate; Anaerobic co-digestion; Trace metals; Digestate dewaterability

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51778352]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [18230710900]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and municipal solid waste leachate can improve energy conversion efficiency and digestate dewaterability, suitable for megacities.
Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and municipal solid waste leachate is attracting more and more attention, addressing the challenges of mono-digestion of food waste. In this paper, challenges in anaerobic digestion of food waste are briefly summarized. The synergistic effects of anaerobic co-digestion of food waste with municipal solid waste leachate are deeply discussed. Improving buffering capacity and trace metals supplementation are the two most important known benefits, while promoting refractory organics degradation and improving digestate dewaterability are firstly been raised to be two potential benefits. An innovative integrated process based on anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and leachate with nanofiltration concentrate ozonation and recirculation are developed for more benefits. Mass balance analysis of the proposed process shows that, compared with mono-digestion, the energy conversion efficiency of anaerobic co-digestion could increase by 12%-18%, with no nanofiltration concentrate generation. Furthermore, the digestate dewaterability could be improved obviously which help reduce the discharge amount of solid digestate. The process feasibility and engineering applicability are discussed, showing that anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and municipal solid waste leachate is applicable, especially in megacities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据