4.5 Article

Five novel dinuclear copper(II) complexes: Crystal structures, properties, Hirshfeld surface analysis and vitro antitumor activity study

期刊

INORGANICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 453, 期 -, 页码 507-515

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2016.09.013

关键词

N,O ligand; Dinuclear copper; Crystal structure; Antitumor activity; Self-quenching effect

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21161006]
  2. Nature Science Foundation of Guangxi Province of China [2015GXNSFAA139031]
  3. Program for the scientific research and technology development plan of Guilin [20150133-5]
  4. Program of the first session backbone teacher of Guangxi of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Five dinuclear copper(II) complexes have been synthesized with three kinds of Schiff bases and Cu (NO3)(2)center dot H2O in different solvent systems: [Cu-2(bdhc)(CH3OH)(NO3)(dmf)(2)] (1), [Cu-2(bdhc)(CH3CH2OH) (NO3)(dmf)(2)] (2) [Cu-2(bchc)(CH3CH2OH)(NO3)(dmf)(2)] (3), [Cu-2(bchc)(CH3OH)(NO3)(dmf)(2)] (4), [Cu-2(bbhc)(H2O)(dmf)(2)center dot NO3-H2O (5) (H(3)bdhc is 1,5-bis(3,5-dibromosalicylidene)-carbohydrazide, H3bchc is 1,5-bis(3,5-dichlorosalicylidene)-carbohydrazide, H(3)bbhc is 1,5-bis(5-bromosalicylidene)-carbohydrazide). All the compounds were characterized by IR spectroscopy, Element analysis and X-ray single -crystal diffraction. The anti -proliferative activity of 1-5 was evaluated against a panel of human tumor cells while 3 exhibited a high antitumor activity against T-24, A549, SK-OV-3 and MGC-803. A detailed analysis of Hirshfeld surface and 2D fingerprint plot revealed that 1-5 were supported mainly by H center dot center dot center dot H, C -H center dot center dot center dot X (X = Cl, Br) and O center dot center dot center dot H intermolecular interactions. Fluorescence properties indicate that all the complexes exist fluorescence concentration self -quenching effect. The magnetic properties of 1 from 2 to 300 K are also discussed. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据