4.5 Article

Aerobic oxidation of ethylbenzene to acetophenone over mesoporous ceria-cobalt mixed oxide catalyst

期刊

RESEARCH ON CHEMICAL INTERMEDIATES
卷 48, 期 2, 页码 471-490

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11164-021-04604-6

关键词

Ethylbenzene; Aerobic oxidation; CeO2-Co3O4 mixed oxide catalysts; Cobalt-doped ceria; Ceria solid solutions; Acetophenone

资金

  1. University Grant Commission (UGC), New Delhi
  2. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mesoporous ceria-cobalt mixed oxides, ceria, and cobalt oxide catalysts were prepared using a modified template-assisted method and showed improved activity in the oxidation of ethylbenzene. The catalyst with a composition of Ce0.9Co0.1O2 exhibited the best performance, attributed to its facile redox behavior, increased surface adsorbed oxygen species, and larger surface area.
Mesoporous ceria-cobalt (Ce0.9Co0.1O2, Ce0.8Co0.2O2 and Ce0.7Co0.3O2) mixed oxides, ceria (CeO2), and cobalt oxide (Co3O4) catalysts were prepared through modified template-assisted method and employed in oxidation of ethylbenzene with molecular oxygen (O-2) without solvent and additives. Prepared catalysts were characterized by various physicochemical characterization techniques. The XRD results showed the formation of solid solutions in cobalt-doped ceria samples. The XPS results indicated the presence of more Ce3+ ions and surface adsorbed oxygen. H-2-TPR profiles revealed a remarkable improvement in the redox behavior of ceria with the doping of cobalt into the ceria lattice. TEM and N-2 adsorption studies showed mesoporous nature of materials. Among the prepared catalysts, Ce0.9Co0.1O2 showed far better activity for oxidation of ethylbenzene with 60% conversion and 87% selectivity toward acetophenone. This is attributed to facile redox behavior, more surface adsorbed oxygen species, and larger surface area of the catalyst and considered as crucial factors to improve the catalytic activity. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据