4.3 Article

Hypercritical Accretion for Black Hole High Spin in Cygnus X-1

期刊

出版社

NATL ASTRONOMICAL OBSERVATORIES, CHIN ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1088/1674-4527/ac4ca4

关键词

gravitational waves; stars: black holes; X-rays: binaries

资金

  1. Doctoral research start-up funding of Anhui Normal University
  2. Key Laboratory for Relativistic Astrophysics in Guangxi University
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12192220, 12192221, U2038106]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Universities in Anhui Province [KJ2021A0106]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent observations have shown that spin measurements in binary black hole systems are typically small, consistent with classical isolated binary evolution. However, high spin values have been consistently found in high-mass X-ray binaries. In order to explain this discrepancy, it is necessary to consider the angular momentum transport mechanism within the progenitors of these black holes.
Recent observations of AdLIGO and Virgo have shown that the spin measurements in binary black hole (BH) systems are typically small, which is consistent with the predictions by the classical isolated binary evolution channel. In this standard formation channel, the progenitor of the first-born BH is assumed to have efficient angular momentum transport. The BH spins in high-mass X-ray binaries (HMXBs), however, have consistently been found to be extremely high. In order to explain the high BH spins, the inefficient angular momentum transport inside the BH progenitor is required. This requirement, however, is incompatible with the current understanding of conventional efficient angular momentum transport mechanism. We find that this tension can be highly alleviated as long as the hypercritical accretion is allowed. We show that, for a case study of Cygnus X-1, the hypercritical accretion cannot only be a good solution for the inconsistent assumption upon the angular momentum transport within massive stars, but match its other properties reported recently.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据