4.6 Article

Comparison of fresh and frozen ejaculated spermatozoa in sibling oocyte recipient cycles

期刊

REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE
卷 44, 期 2, 页码 333-339

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.09.020

关键词

Delivery rate; Fresh ejaculated sperm; Frozen ejaculated sperm; ICSI; In vitro fertilization; Sibling oocytes

资金

  1. Clinical and Translational Science Center at Weill Cornell Medical College [1-UL1-TR002384-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study compared pregnancy outcomes in couples with non-male factor infertility using IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with fresh and frozen ejaculated spermatozoa. Results showed that frozen sperm resulted in lower delivery rates compared to fresh sperm, with significantly higher pregnancy loss rates. Adjusted odds for delivery were lower in the frozen group, while odds for pregnancy and implantation were not significantly different between fresh and frozen sperm groups.
Research question: Do IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles using fresh and frozen ejaculated spermatozoa result in similar pregnancy outcomes in couples with non-male factor infertility? Design: Retrospective cohort study; patients undergoing donor egg recipient cycles, in which oocytes from a single ovarian stimulation were split between two recipients, were reviewed. Two recipients of oocytes from a single donor were paired and categorized based on the type of ejaculated spermatozoa (fresh/frozen). Outcomes included delivery rate, implantation, pregnancy, pregnancy loss and fertilization rates. Results: Of the 408 patients who received oocytes from a split donor oocyte cycle, 45 pairs of patients used discrepant types of ejaculated spermatozoa and were included in the study. Fertilization rate: fresh (74.8%); frozen (68.6%) (P = 0.13). Pregnancy rate: fresh (76%); frozen (67%); delivery rate: fresh (69%); frozen (44%); implantation rate was significantly higher: fresh (64%); frozen (36%) (P = 0.04). Rate of pregnancy loss was significantly higher in the frozen group compared with the fresh group (33% versus 5.9%, P = 0.013). Adjusted odds for delivery was 67% lower in the frozen group (95% CI 0.12, 0.89). Adjusted odds of pregnancy (adjusted OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.20, 2.27) and implantation (adjusted OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.12, 2.12) were not significantly different between the frozen and fresh sperm groups. Conclusion: In this model that controls for oocyte quality by using paired recipients from the same donor, frozen ejaculated spermatozoa resulted in lower delivery rates than those using fresh spermatozoa

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据