4.7 Article

Influence of air staging strategies on flue gas sensible heat losses and gaseous emissions of a wood pellet boiler: An experimental study

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 178, 期 -, 页码 532-548

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.150

关键词

Solid fuel combustion; Air staging; Small-scale boiler; Wood pellets; Experimental study; Primary emission reduction measures

资金

  1. Slovenian Research Agency [P2-0196]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study achieved the simultaneous reduction of NOx and CO emissions, as well as a reduction in the sensible heat loss of flue gas, by optimizing process parameters of the combustion system.
An effective air staging strategy is of great importance for achieving low emissions and sensible heat losses through flue gas extraction. In cases where a commercially available system needs to be optimised, often the only viable measure is the modification of process parameters. In this work, the aim is to (1) Discover a combination of the most suitable process parameters based on a multi-criteria decision-making method and (2) To unveil relevant correlations between the two process parameters under study (PA/SA ratio and excess air), emissions and combustion temperatures. A modified commercial small-scale hot water wood pellet boiler was installed into a laboratory heating system. Nine different cases have been addressed within a parametric study, differing in the PA/SA ratio and overall excess air. Emissions, temperatures inside the combustion chamber and the flow rate of air entering the combustion chamber were measured. A low PA/SA ratio of 0.53 (54.7% reduction from factory settings), combined with a low O-2 concentration in the flue gases of 5.26% (39.8% reduction from factory settings), and the elimination of infiltration air resulted in a simultaneous reduction of NOx and CO emissions by 14.4% and 93.9% respectively and a flue gas sensible heat loss reduction of 31.6%. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据