4.7 Article

Transverse wedge-shaped rib roughened solar air heater (SAH)-Exergy based experimental investigation

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 184, 期 -, 页码 1150-1164

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.005

关键词

Artificial roughness; SAH; Reynolds number; Transverse wedge shaped; Heat transfer; Exergy efficiency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the heat transfer in roughened solar air ducts was enhanced using transverse wedge shaped roughened absorbers, which provided ambient cool air to the absorber plate surface and roughness elements on the heated plate, thereby improving the heat transfer coefficient.
The major challenge faced in heat transfer augmentation in roughened solar air duct is the formation of viscous sublayer near heat transferring surface. The present investigation uses main air supply flow under roughened duct mounted with transverse wedge shaped roughened absorbers for the heated air jet delivery. This technique is prolific as it provides the ambient cool air to the entire absorber plate surface as well as the roughness element on the heated absorber plate that considerably enhances the heat transfer coefficient. Data of everyday was documented under diverse range of parameters viz., Re 3000-18000, rib wedge angle (phi) of 8 degrees, 10 degrees, 12 degrees and 15 degrees, relative roughness pitch (p/e) of 60.17(phi)(-1.0264) < p/e < 12.12 and relative roughness height (e/D-h) of 0.015-0.033. The massflow rate ranges from 0.0174 to 0.0352 kg/s. Maximum exergetic efficiency (eta(II)) observed was 4.95 corresponding to (To-Ti)/I of 0.035 at a massflow rate of 0.0346 kg/s. Also maximum (eta(II)) was 4.14 at p/e = 7.57, e/D-h = 0.033 and at 4 = 10 at a massflow rate of 0.03 kg/s with respect to varying geometrical configuration. Maximum exergy efficiency of 4.95% accomplished justifies that the use of transverse wedge shaped roughness element is prolific for enhancing heat transfer. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据