4.8 Review

Techno-economic review of alternative fuels and propulsion systems for the aviation sector

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111564

关键词

Future aviation fuels; Aircraft propulsion; Cost; Biofuels; Electrofuels; Hydrogen

资金

  1. Swedish Energy Agency
  2. Swedish Knowledge Centre for Renewable Transportation Fuels (f3) [collaborative research program Renewable transportation fuels and systems program (Samverkansprogrammet Fornybara drivmedel och system)] [P48357-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Substitution of conventional jet fuel with low-to zero-carbon-emitting alternative aviation fuels is crucial for meeting climate targets in aviation. This study reviews alternative fuels and propulsion systems, focusing on costs and technical maturity, and presents conceptual aircraft designs for different aviation fuels. The overall cost is a key factor for future implementation, with renewable aviation fuels showing higher DOC than conventional jet fuels, and bio-jet fuels offering the lowest MJFSP among alternative options.
Substitution of conventional jet fuel with low-to zero-carbon-emitting alternative aviation fuels is vital for meeting the climate targets for aviation. It is important to understand the technical, environmental, and economic performance of alternative aviation fuels and prospective engine and propulsion technologies for future aircraft. This study reviews alternative fuels and propulsion systems, focusing on costs and technical maturity, and presents conceptual aircraft designs for different aviation fuels. The cost review includes minimum jet fuel selling price (MJFSP) for alternative aviation fuels. Direct operating cost (DOC) is estimated based on the conceptual aircraft designs and the reviewed MJFSP. The DOCs for bio-jet fuel (5.0-9.2 US cent per passengerkilometer (cent/PAX/km)), fossil and renewable liquefied hydrogen (5.9-10.1 and 8.1-23.9 cent/PAX/km, respectively), and electro-methane and electro-jet fuel (5.6-16.7 and 9.2-23.7 cent/PAX/km, respectively) are higher than for conventional jet fuel (3.9-4.8 cent/PAX/km) and liquefied natural gas (4.2-5.2 cent/PAX/km). Overall, DOC of renewable aviation fuels is 15-500 % higher than conventional jet fuels. Among the bio-jet fuels, hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids (23-310 $/GJ) and alcohol-to-jet (4-215 $/GJ) pathways offer the lowest MJFSPs. The implementation of alternative fuels in existing aircraft engines and the design and development of appropriate propulsion systems and aircraft are challenging. The overall cost is a key factor for future implementation. Bio-jet fuel is most promising in the near term while hydrogen and electrofuels in the long term. The level of carbon tax on fossil jet fuels needed for the latter options to be competitive depend on the hydrogen production cost.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据