4.8 Article

Scientific and stakeholder evidence-based assessment: Ecosystem response to floating solar photovoltaics and implications for sustainability

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111639

关键词

Floatovoltaics; Floating solar; Renewable energy; Water quality; Natural capital; Sustainability; Ecosystem impact; Knowledge system

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Envision DTP Industrial CASE studentship [NE/R010226/1]
  2. United Utilities
  3. NERC Industrial Innovation Fellowship [NE/R013489/1]
  4. Lancaster University EPSRC IAA [EP/R511560/1]
  5. U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy under the Solar Energy Technologies Office [DE-EE0008746]
  6. Enel Green Power S.p.A.
  7. Affinity Water
  8. South East Water
  9. Southern Water
  10. Thames Water

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study indicates that floating solar photovoltaic installations may have potential physical, chemical, and biological impacts on water bodies, including reduced water evaporation, changes to water chemistry, and deoxygenation. These impacts have implications for ecosystem services and the Sustainable Development Goals.
Floating solar photovoltaic (FPV) installations are increasing globally. However, their interaction with the hosting water body and implications for ecosystem function is poorly understood. Understanding potential impacts is critical as water bodies provide many ecosystem services on which humans rely and are integral for delivering the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Here, we used scientific evidence from a systematic review and stakeholder expertise, captured through an international survey and a workshop, alongside existing understanding of the role of water bodies in delivering ecosystem services and the SDGs. We found 22 evidence outcomes that indicated potential physical, chemical and biological impacts of FPV on water bodies. Assessment by stakeholders from across sectors indicated that reduced water evaporation is the greatest opportunity, whilst changes to water chemistry, including nitrification and deoxygenation, are the greatest threat. Despite these findings, FPV operators reported no observed water quality or ecosystem impacts. However, only 15% of respondents had performed water quality analysis; visual inspection alone cannot ascertain all water quality impacts. Based on the integration of these findings, we determined that FPV could impact nine ecosystem services. Furthermore, established linkages between ecosystem services and SDGs indicate the potential for impacts on eight SDGs, although whether the impact is positive or negative is likely to depend on FPV design and water body type. Our results further the understanding of the effects of FPVs on host water bodies and may help to ensure the anticipated growth in FPVs minimises threats and maximises opportunities, safeguarding overall sustainability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据