4.7 Article

Research on a seismic connectivity reliability model of power systems based on the quasi-Monte Carlo method

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107888

关键词

Power system; Reliability analysis; Quasi-Monte Carlo; Sobol sequence; Triangle algorithm

资金

  1. National key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFC1509302]
  2. Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi Province [2021ZDLSF06-10]
  3. Xi'an Science and Technology Project [2019113813CXSF016SF026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study applies the quasi-Monte Carlo method and the triangle algorithm to improve the efficiency and accuracy of seismic connectivity reliability assessment in power systems. By combining seismic hazard analysis and fragility analysis results, the effectiveness of this method is further validated.
To improve the speed of the error convergence of the Monte Carlo method in the seismic connectivity reliability assessment of power systems, the quasi-Monte Carlo method sampled by a low-discrepancy sequence is applied in the reliability evaluation. In addition, a triangle algorithm that can reduce the amount of computation in solving connectivity matrix is proposed to establish a seismic connectivity reliability calculation model with low-discrepancy sequence sampling. The ground motion attenuation model and the magnification effect of site soil were used to perform a seismic hazard analysis of the demonstration area, and the peak ground acceleration and the spatial distribution characteristics of the power system were obtained. Based on the results of the fragility analysis of a 110 kV substation and a 330 kV substation in Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, the standard Monte Carlo simulation and the Sobol sequence quasi-Monte Carlo simulation are carried out. The results show that with the same sampling number, the triangle algorithm has higher operational efficiency. Combining the triangle algorithm with the quasi-Monte Carlo method improves not only the accuracy but also the calculation speed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据