4.7 Article

GEC-ESTRO ACROP prostate brachytherapy guidelines

期刊

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
卷 167, 期 -, 页码 244-251

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.047

关键词

Brachytherapy; Prostate cancer; Consensus guidelines; Low Dose Rate; High Dose Rate

资金

  1. NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This evidence-based guideline provides updated guidance on prostate brachytherapy, a treatment technique for non-metastatic prostate cancer using permanent or temporary implantation. Prostate brachytherapy allows for safe radiation dose escalation and improved PSA control compared to external beam radiotherapy alone.
This is an evidence-based guideline for prostate brachytherapy. Throughout levels of evidence quoted are those from the Oxford Centre for Evidence based Medicine (https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/ levels-of-evidence/oxford-centre-for-evidence-based-medicine-levels-of-evidence-march-2009). Prostate interstitial brachytherapy using either permanent or temporary implantation is an established and evolving treatment technique for non-metastatic prostate cancer. Permanent brachytherapy uses Low Dose Rate (LDR) sources, most commonly I-125, emitting photon radiation over months. Temporary brachytherapy involves first placing catheters within the prostate and, on confirmation of accurate positioning, temporarily introducing the radioactive source, generally High Dose Rate (HDR) radioactive sources of Ir-192 or less commonly Co-60. Pulsed dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy has also been used for prostate cancer [1] but few centres have adopted this approach. Previous GEC ESTRO recommendations have considered LDR and HDR separately [2-4] but as there is considerable overlap, this paper provides updated guidance for both treatment techniques. Prostate brachytherapy allows safe radiation dose escalation beyond that achieved using external beam radiotherapy alone as it has greater conformity around the prostate, sparing surrounding rectum, bladder, and penile bulb. In addition there are fewer issues with changes in prostate position during treatment delivery. Systematic review and randomised trials using both techniques as boost treatments demonstrate improved PSA control when compared to external beam radiotherapy alone [5-7]. (C) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据