4.4 Article

EM-based likelihood inference for one-shot device test data under log-normal lifetimes and the optimal design of a CSALT plan

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/qre.3014

关键词

accelerated life-test; best test plan; EM algorithm; lognormal distribution; optimal design; one-shot device; reliability

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades (Spain) [PGC2018-095194-B-I00]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the application of the EM algorithm for likelihood estimation based on lognormal lifetime distribution in one-shot device testing, and explores the design of optimal CSALTs under this setup with budget constraints. A simulation study is conducted to assess the performance of the developed inference methods, and real-life data are analyzed for illustrative purposes.
One-shot devices result in an extreme case of interval censoring, wherein one can only know whether the failure time is either before or after the test time. The study of one-shot device testing has been developed considerably recently, both in terms of estimation and optimal design under different lifetime distributions. However, one-shot device testing analysis under lognormal lifetime distribution has not been studied yet. While the hazard function for exponential distribution is always a constant, and that of Weibull and gamma are either increasing or decreasing, the lognormal distribution has increasing - decreasing behavior of hazard which is encountered often in practice as units usually experience early failure and then stabilize over time in terms of performance. In this paper, we develop the EM algorithm for the likelihood estimation based on one-shot device test data under lognormal distribution and also the design of optimal CSALTs (constant stress accelerated life tests) under this set up with budget constraints. A simulation study is carried out to assess the performance of the methods of inference developed here and some real-life data are analyzed for illustrative purpose.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据