4.6 Article

Health evidence in United Kingdom House of Commons Select Committee inquiries

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 201, 期 -, 页码 1-7

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.09.031

关键词

Wider determinants; Health policy; Evidence-based policy; Inequalities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate how health evidence is submitted to national policymakers in the UK across sectors. Findings showed that many inquiries related to determinants of health were not conducted by the Health and Social Care Committee, with varying levels of contribution from health sources.
Objectives: The objective of the study was to explore how health evidence is submitted to national policymakers in the United Kingdom outside of the health sector. Study design: The study design used is document review. Methods: The parliament.uk website was searched for House of Commons Select Committee inquiries relevant to health but not undertaken by the Health and Social Care Committee between 2015 and 2019. The written and oral evidence used in these inquiries were searched for submissions by health sources. Results: Twenty-two inquiries were found, covering a range of determinants of health. A median of 10 pieces of written evidence (interquartile range [IQR] 5-16) and 16% of the oral evidence (IQR 6-32%) was provided by health sources, per inquiry. Health researchers contributed written evidence to 19 and oral evidence to 13 inquires. National public health organisations contributed written evidence to 11 and oral evidence to nine inquiries. Conclusions: A significant number of inquiries relating to the determinants of health were not carried out by the Health and Social Care Committee. Health sources variably contributed evidence to these inquiries. There is an opportunity to submit more evidence to national policymakers to advocate for healthy policies across sectors. (c) 2021 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据