4.7 Review

Gestational weight gain and risk of postpartum depression: A meta-analysis of observational studies

期刊

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
卷 310, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114448

关键词

Gestational weight gain; Postpartum depression; Meta-analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This meta-analysis aimed to assess the association between gestational weight gain (GWG) and postpartum depression (PPD). The study found that both excessive and inadequate weight gain during pregnancy were associated with a higher risk of developing PPD. These results emphasize the importance of prevention and intervention strategies to promote maternal and infant health during pregnancy.
The association between gestational weight gain (GWG) and postpartum depression (PPD) is still controversial. The present study aimed to assess the association between GWG and the risk of developing PPD by means of a meta-analysis. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, China Biology Medicine disk, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Weipu, and Wanfang database were searched up to May 19, 2021 to identify relevant studies that evaluated the association between GWG and PPD. Meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan software and Stata software. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were carried out to explore the potential heterogeneity source, and Begg's funnel plots and Begg's linear regression test were performed to assess the potential publication bias. A total of sixteen studies involving 100,438 participants were identified in this study. Overall, the total, excessive and inadequate GWG was significantly associated with a higher risk of developing PPD. These results emphasize the necessity of strengthening the prevention and intervention of excessive and inadequate weight gain during pregnancy to promote maternal and infant health. However, further studies on the association between GWG at different stages of pregnancy and the risk of developing PPD are warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据