Conservation and coevolution determine evolvability of different classes of disordered residues in human intrinsically disordered proteins

Structure, function, and evolution are interdependent properties of proteins. Diversity of protein functions arising from structural variations is a potential driving force behind protein evolvability. Intrinsically disordered proteins or regions (IDPs or IDRs) lack well-defined structure under normal physiological conditions, yet, they are highly functional. Increased occurrence of IDPs in eukaryotes compared to prokaryotes indicates strong correlation of protein evolution and disorderedness. IDPs generally have higher evolution rate compared to globular proteins. Structural pliability allows IDPs to accommodate multiple mutations without affecting their functional potential. Nevertheless, how evolutionary signals vary between different classes of disordered residues (DRs) in IDPs is poorly understood. This study addresses variation of evolutionary behavior in terms of residue conservation and intra-protein coevolution among structural and functional classes of DRs in IDPs. Analyses are performed on 579 human IDPs, which are classified based on length of IDRs, interacting partners and functional classes. We find short IDRs are less conserved than long IDRs or full IDPs. Functional classes which require flexibility and specificity to perform their activity comparatively evolve slower than others. Disorder promoting amino acids evolve faster than order promoting amino acids. Pro, Gly, Ile, and Phe have unique coevolving nature which further emphasizes on their roles in IDPs. This study sheds light on evolutionary footprints in different classes of DRs from human IDPs and enhances our understanding of the structural and functional potential of IDPs.

Automated summary

This study explores the relationship between protein structure, function, and evolution, revealing different evolutionary characteristics among different classes of DRs in IDPs. Short IDRs show lower conservation, while functional classes requiring flexibility and specificity evolve slower. Amino acids promoting disorder evolve faster, with Pro, Gly, Ile, and Phe exhibiting unique coevolving nature in IDPs.