4.6 Article

APERTRACK: A particle-tracking model to simulate radionuclide transport in the Arabian/Persian Gulf

期刊

PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY
卷 142, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.103998

关键词

Arabian; Persian Gulf; Tide; Baroclinic circulation; Radionuclide; Transport; Sediment

资金

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades [PGC2018-094546-B-I00]
  2. Junta de Andalucia (Consejeria de Economia y Conocimiento), Spain [US-1263369]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study describes a Lagrangian rapid-response model for simulating the transport of radionuclides in the Arabian Gulf, using hypothetical releases from a coastal nuclear power plant to show how the moment of release affects the fate of radionuclides, and how the geochemical behavior of the radionuclide affects further distribution.
A Lagrangian rapid-response model for simulating the transport of radionuclides in the Arabian (or Persian) Gulf is described. The model is based on a tide model including five constituents, which was solved in advance, and baroclinic circulation was obtained from HYCOM operational ocean model. The radionuclide model includes physical transport (advection and diffusion), radioactive decay and geochemical processes (interactions of radionuclides between water and sediments, described in a dynamic way). The model can lead with instantaneous or continuous releases. Some hypothetical releases from a coastal nuclear power plant were simulated. Results show that the moment of release affects the fate of radionuclides due to the temporal variability of baroclinic currents. Also, comparing results for releases of Cs and Pu, it was seen how the geochemical behaviour of the radionuclide clearly affects the further radionuclide distributions. It is easy to setup the model for a particular release and it provides a fast response; thus the present model is an appropriate tool to support decision-making after a nuclear accident.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据