4.4 Review

Current Research Progress in Magnesium Borohydride for Hydrogen Storage (A review)

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnsc.2021.11.001

关键词

Magnesium borohydride; Hydrogen storage; Borohydrides; Kinetics; Thermodynamics

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Plan [2018YFB1502102]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52071141, 51371056, 51771056, 51701043]
  3. Equipment Pre-research Field Foundation [6140721040101]
  4. Inter-disciplinary Innovation Program of North China Electric Power University [XM2112355]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogen storage in solid-state materials is considered to be a promising technology due to its efficiency, low risk and cost. Mg(BH4)2 is a potential material for hydrogen storage, but research has been done to improve its thermodynamics and kinetics due to its drawbacks.
Hydrogen storage in solid-state materials is believed to be a most promising hydrogen-storage technology for high efficiency, low risk and low cost. Mg(BH4)(2) is regarded as one of most potential materials in hydrogen storage areas in view of its high hydrogen capacities (14.9 wt% and 145-147 kg cm(-3)). However, the drawbacks of Mg(BH4)(2) including high desorption temperatures (about 250 degrees C-580 degrees C), sluggish kinetics, and poor reversibility make it difficult to be used for onboard hydrogen storage of fuel cell vehicles. A lot of researches on improving the dehydrogenation reaction thermodynamics and kinetics have been done, mainly including: additives or catalysts doping, nanoconfining Mg(BH4)(2) in nanoporous hosts, forming reactive hydrides systems, multi-cation/anion composites or other derivatives of Mg(BH4)(2). Some favorable results have been obtained. This review provides an overview of current research progress in magnesium borohydride, including: synthesis methods, crystal structures, decomposition behaviors, as well as emphasized performance improvements for hydrogen storage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据