4.5 Article

Improving operating room efficiency using lean management tools

期刊

PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL
卷 34, 期 13, 页码 1261-1274

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2021.1998932

关键词

Efficiency; improvement; operating rooms; scheduling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introducing Lean management in healthcare can improve surgical performance and patient satisfaction. Through the use of improvement teams and Lean tools, processes can be optimized, waiting times reduced, and operating room efficiency increased, leading to a cultural change in surgical resource management.
Introducing Lean management (LM) enables the surgical process to reach considerably high levels of performance and efficiency, in addition to increased patient safety and satisfaction among healthcare professionals. This contribution presents a consolidated model of LM which has proved highly successful in improving both overall efficiency in operation rooms and patients' perceived value of efficient hospital care. This model is based on a real case study carried out over a 3-year period. A surgical process improvement team was set up, which then designed a Process Value Flow Map using LM tools, and detected opportunities for improvement. The map reflects the patient's journey through the process, the flow of information and materials for optimising processes. Findings from the three improvement projects described in the paper were used to (1) enhance waiting list management, (2) improve operating room scheduling criteria and sharing of surgical resources, and (3) create continuous improvement teams. The results of the study are twofold: (1) reduced waiting times for operations and (2) increased efficiency of operating rooms stemming from a cultural change in surgical resources management, particularly activity planning. A notable increase in surgical efficiency indicators was also observed, as well as the need to incorporate Lean principles into surgical intervention programming.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据