期刊
出版社
NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2114648119
关键词
autism; kinematics; action observation; intention readout; intersection
资金
- EnTimeMent EU H2020 FETPROACT Grant [824160]
- NIH BRAIN Initiative Grant [R01NS109961]
This study reveals that individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) have difficulties in reading intentions from movements but are able to identify single-trial variations in movement kinematics. The results suggest that ASD individuals show better recognition of intention-informative features during observation of ASD actions, while typically developing (TD) children show better recognition of intention-informative kinematic features during observation of TD actions.
Observers with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) find it difficult to read intentions from movements. However, the computational bases of these difficulties are unknown. Do these difficulties reflect an intention readout deficit, or are they more likely rooted in kinematic (dis-)similarities between typical and ASD kinematics? We combined motion tracking, psychophysics, and computational analyses to uncover single-trial intention readout computations in typically developing (TD) children (n = 35) and children with ASD (n = 35) who observed actions performed by TD children and children with ASD. Average intention discrimination performance was above chance for TD observers but not for ASD observers. However, single-trial analysis showed that both TD and ASD observers read single-trial variations in movement kinematics. TD readers were better able to identify intention-informative kinematic features during observation of TD actions; conversely, ASD readers were better able to identify intention-informative features during observation of ASD actions. Crucially, while TD observers were generally able to extract the intention information encoded in movement kinematics, those with autism were unable to do so. These results extend existing conceptions of mind reading in ASD by suggesting that intention reading difficulties reflect both an interaction failure, rooted in kinematic dissimilarity between TD and ASD kinematics (at the level of feature identification), and an individual readout deficit (at the level of information extraction), accompanied by an overall reduced sensitivity of intention readout to single-trial variations in movement kinematics.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据