期刊
出版社
NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2100786118
关键词
information diffusion; network analysis; social media; misinformation
资金
- Army Research Office Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative Award [W911NF-20-1-0252]
The study focuses on comparing the structural properties of information cascades in online diffusion, emphasizing the importance of controlling for cascade sizes to draw conclusions accurately. Differences in cascade topology between true and false news can mainly be attributed to the size of cascades, while differences in videos, images, news, and petitions persist even when controlling for size. The findings suggest that the mechanisms underlying the diffusion of true and false news are similar, with the primary difference being in the infectiousness of their spreading process.
Do some types of information spread faster, broader, or further than others? To understand how information diffusions differ, scholars compare structural properties of the paths taken by content as it spreads through a network, studying so-called cascades. Commonly studied cascade properties include the reach, depth, breadth, and speed of propagation. Drawing conclusions from statistical differences in these properties can be challenging, as many properties are dependent. In this work, we demonstrate the essentiality of controlling for cascade sizes when studying structural differences between collections of cascades. We first revisit two datasets from notable recent studies of online diffusion that reported content-specific differences in cascade topology: an exhaustive corpus of Twitter cascades for verified true-or false-news content by Vosoughi et al. [S. Vosoughi, D. Roy, S. Aral. Science 359, 1146-1151 (2018)] and a comparison of Twitter cascades of videos, pictures, news, and petitions by Goel et al. [S. Goel, A. Anderson, J. Hofman, D. J. Watts. Manage. Sci. 62, 180-196 (2016)]. Using methods that control for joint cascade statistics, we find that for false-and true-news cascades, the reported structural differences can almost entirely be explained by false-news cascades being larger. For videos, images, news, and petitions, structural differences persist when controlling for size. Studying classical models of diffusion, we then give conditions under which differences in structural properties under different models do or do not reduce to differences in size. Our findings are consistent with the mechanisms underlying true-and false news diffusion being quite similar, differing primarily in the basic infectiousness of their spreading process.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据