4.8 Article

Grapevines under drought do not express esca leaf symptoms

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2112825118

关键词

abiotic-biotic interactions; carbon balance; drought; plant dieback; vascular disease

资金

  1. French Ministry of Agriculture and Food
  2. FranceAgriMer
  3. Comite National des Interprofessions des Vins a appellation d'origine et a indication geographique within the PHYSIOPATH Project (Program Plan National Deperissement du Vignoble) [22001150-1506]
  4. Isabelle Demeaux (UMR SAVE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In grapevine, drought completely inhibited the leaf symptom expression of vascular disease (esca). By quantifying whole-plant water relations and carbon balance, the study revealed distinct physiological responses to these two stresses, indicating different gas exchange and nonstructural carbohydrate dynamics.
In the context of climate change, plant mortality is increasing worldwide in both natural and agroecosystems. However, our understanding of the underlying causes is limited by the complex interactions between abiotic and biotic factors and the technical challenges that limit investigations of these interactions. Here, we studied the interaction between two main drivers of mortality, drought and vascular disease (esca), in one of the world's most economically valuable fruit crops, grapevine. We found that drought totally inhibited esca leaf symptom expression. We disentangled the plant physiological response to the two stresses by quantifying whole-plant water relations (i.e., water potential and stomatal conductance) and carbon balance (i.e., CO2 assimilation, chlorophyll, and nonstructural carbohydrates). Our results highlight the distinct physiology behind these two stress responses, indicating that esca (and subsequent stomatal conductance decline) does not result from decreases in water potential and generates different gas exchange and nonstructural carbohydrate seasonal dynamics compared to drought.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据