4.7 Article

Encapsulation of Two Potassium Cations in Preyssler-Type Phosphotungstates: Preparation, Structural Characterization, Thermal Stability, Activity as an Acid Catalyst, and HAADF-STEM Images

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 55, 期 21, 页码 11583-11592

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b02116

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, and Science, Japan [26420787]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN) [CTQ2014-52774-P]
  3. DGR of the Generalitat de Catalunya [2014SGR199]
  4. XRQTC
  5. JSPS KAKENHI [JP16K06863]
  6. A-STEP program of the Japanese Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  7. Furukawa Foundation for Promotion of Technology
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26420787, 16K06863, 15H06425] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dipotassium cation (K+)-encapsulated Preyssler-type phosphotungstate, [P5W30O110K2](13-), was prepared by heating monobismuth (Bi3+)-encapsulated Preyssler-type phosphotungstate, [P5W30O110Bi-(H2O)](12-), in acetate buffer in the presence of an excess amount of potassium cations. Characterization of the isolated potassium salt, K-13[P5W30O110K2] (1a), and its acid form, H-13[P5W30O110K2] (1b), by single crystal X-ray structure analysis, P-31 and W-183 nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry (CV), high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectroscopy (HR-ESI-MS), and elemental analysis revealed that two potassium cations are encapsulated in the Preyssler-type phosphotungstate molecule with formal D-5h symmetry, which is the first example of a Preyssler-type compound with two encapsulated cations. Incorporation of two potassium cations enhances the thermal stability of the potassium salt, and the acid form shows catalytic activity for hydration of ethyl acetate. Packing of the Preyssler-type molecules was observed by high resolution high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据