4.5 Article

Multidisciplinary design optimization of vehicle chassis product family

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/09544054211036642

关键词

Vehicle chassis; product family; platformization; multidisciplinary design optimization; optimization

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB0103704]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51675044]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A product family optimization design method that combines shared variable decision-making and multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) was proposed to improve the performance of automotive product platforms and product families. The effectiveness of this method was demonstrated through an example, showing that collaboratively optimized product families can effectively handle coordination between multiple products and multiple targets, maximize part commonality, and leverage the advantages of product platforms.
In order to improve the performance of automotive product platforms and product families while keeping high development efficiency, a product family optimization design method that combines shared variable decision-making and multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) is proposed. First, the basic concepts related to product family design optimization were clarified. Then, the mathematical description and MDO model of the product family optimization problem were established, and the improved product family design process was given. Finally, for the chassis product family optimization problem of an automotive product platform, the effectiveness of the proposed optimization method, and design process were exemplified. The results show that the collaboratively optimized product family can effectively handle the coordination between multiple products and multiple targets, compared to Non-platform development, it can maximize the generalization rate of vehicle parts and components under the premise of ensuring key performance, and give full play to the advantages of product platforms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据