4.5 Review

Prevalence and associated risk factors of Neospora caninum infection among cattle in mainland China: A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE
卷 201, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105593

关键词

Neospora caninum; Cattle; Mainland China; Meta-analysis; Prevalence

资金

  1. Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation [6212014]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFD0501200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A systematic review and meta-analysis found that the overall prevalence of Neospora caninum infection among cattle in mainland China was 13.69%, and Neospora-infected cows were 2.42 times more likely to abort than uninfected cows. This highlights the importance of implementing appropriate prevention and control strategies to reduce economic losses in the cattle industry.
Neospora caninum, an intracellular protozoan, has attracted much attention because of the etiology of reproductive disorders in cattle. Although numerous relevant studies have been published, the overall prevalence of Neospora caninum infection among cattle in mainland China is still unknown, and associated risk factors need to be evaluated to establish preventive measures. We systematically searched four databases for epidemiologic studies that investigated the prevalence and associated risk factors of this parasite among cattle in mainland China. A total of 33,945 cattle from 51 studies were tested. The pooled prevalence of Neospora caninum among cattle in mainland China was 13.69% (95% CI: 10.86%-17.12%) through the random-effects model, which showed high heterogeneity, I-2 = 98%. The analysis showed that Neospora infection-positive cows were 2.42 times more likely to abort than infection-negative cows (OR 2.42; 95% CI: 2.07-2.84). Our analysis indicated that Neospora-infection is widely distributed among cattle in China, which reinforces the importance of adequate prevention and control strategies to reduce economic losses for the cattle industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据