4.7 Review

Aspirin use for cancer prevention: A systematic review of public, patient and healthcare provider attitudes and adherence behaviours

期刊

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
卷 154, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106872

关键词

Preventive therapy; Chemoprevention; Decision-making; Aspirin; NSAID

资金

  1. Cancer Research UK (AsCaP) [C569/A24991]
  2. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/P000745/1]
  3. National Institute for Health Research NIHR Advanced Fellowship [NIHR300588]
  4. Yorkshire Cancer Research University Academic Fellowship
  5. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [NIHR300588] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The systematic review synthesized data on attitudes and behavior towards the use of aspirin for cancer prevention, as well as healthcare providers' attitudes towards implementing aspirin in practice. Eligible users of aspirin showed moderate to high willingness to participate in trials evaluating aspirin for preventive therapy, with high day-to-day adherence among trial participants. Healthcare providers generally perceived aspirin as a suitable option for cancer prevention.
We undertook a systematic review to synthesise the data on attitudes and behaviour towards the use of aspirin for cancer prevention, and healthcare providers' attitudes towards implementing aspirin in practice. Searches were carried out across 12 databases (e.g. MEDLINE, EMBASE). We used the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool to evaluate study quality, and conducted a narrative synthesis of the data. The review was pre-registered (PROSPERO: CRD42018093453). Thirty-eight studies were identified. Uptake and adherence data were all from trials. Trials recruited healthy participants, those at higher risk of cancer, and those with cancer. Four studies reported moderate to high (40.9-77.7%) uptake to an aspirin trial among people who were eligible. Most trials (18/22) reported high day-to-day adherence (>80%). Three trials observed no association between gender and adherence. One trial found no association between adherence and colorectal cancer risk. Three studies reported moderate to high (43.6-76.0%) hypothetical willingness to use aspirin. Two studies found that a high proportion of healthcare providers (72.0-76.0%) perceived aspirin to be a suitable cancer prevention option. No qualitative studies were identified. The likelihood that eligible users of aspirin would participate in a trial evaluating the use of aspirin for preventive therapy was moderate to high. Among participants in a trial, day-to-day adherence was high. Further research is needed to identify uptake and adherence rates in routine care, the factors affecting aspirin use, and the barriers to implementing aspirin into clinical care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据