4.4 Article

Diagnostic yield of genome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies

期刊

PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
卷 42, 期 7, 页码 822-830

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pd.6108

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Toronto McLaughlin Centre, Canada [MC-2016-11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genome sequencing has the potential to be a comprehensive prenatal test for the diagnosis of fetal abnormalities. In this study, sequencing identified diagnostic variants in 14% of fetuses and variants of uncertain significance in 19% of fetuses. Genome sequencing offers a more comprehensive analysis and has the potential to replace multiple consecutive tests.
Objective Genome sequencing (GS >30x) is beginning to be adopted as a comprehensive genome-wide test for the diagnosis of rare disease in the post-natal setting. Recent studies demonstrated the utility of exome sequencing (ES) in prenatal diagnosis, we investigate the potential benefits for GS to act as a comprehensive prenatal test for diagnosis of fetal abnormalities. Methods We performed GS on a prospective cohort of 37 singleton fetuses with ultrasound-identified structural abnormalities undergoing invasive prenatal testing. GS was performed in parallel with standard diagnostic testing, and the prioritized variants were classified according to ACMG guidelines and reviewed by a panel of board-certified laboratory and clinical geneticists. Results Diagnostic sequence variants were identified in 5 fetuses (14%), with pathogenic variants found in NIPBL, FOXF1, RERE, AMMECR1, and FLT4. A further 7 fetuses (19%) had variants of uncertain significance (VUS) that may explain the phenotypes. Importantly, GS also identified all pathogenic variants reported by clinical microarray (2 CNVs, 5%). Conclusion Prenatal GS offered diagnoses (sequence variants and CNVs) in 19% of fetuses with structural anomalies. GS has the potential of replacing multiple consecutive tests, including microarray, gene panels, and WES, to provide the most comprehensive analysis in a timely manner necessary for prenatal diagnosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据