4.7 Article

Experimental investigation on PMMA dust explosion venting at elevated static activation pressure

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 392, 期 -, 页码 402-411

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.07.034

关键词

Dust explosion venting; External flame; Pressure characteristics; Venting sizing guidance

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51922025, 51874066]
  2. Science and Technology Major Project of Liaoning Province [2019JH1/10300002]
  3. Elite Foundation of Revitalizing Liaoning [XLYC1907161]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focused on flame behavior and overpressure characteristics at different dust concentrations and static activation pressures. Lowering dust concentration helps to mitigate external flame, while blindly reducing static activation pressure poses greater risk. Analysis was also conducted on reduced explosion pressure inside the chamber.
Vented PMMA dust explosions were conducted in a 20-L spherical chamber with a venting diameter of 80 mm. The flame behaviors and overpressure characteristics at different dust concentrations and static activation pressure were studied. The development mechanism of external flame and the comparison results with two standards were analyzed. The results showed the reduction of dust concentration was necessary for mitigating the external flame, while blindly decreased the static activation pressure would bring greater risk. The characteristics of reduced explosion pressure inside the chamber were analyzed combined with external pressure. Then the rupture mechanism of the venting diaphragm was established based on the elastoplastic analysis. Two empirical modified equation for NFPA68 and EN14491 was established. For NFPA68, the volume correction coefficient of size effect was introduced and the inapplicability of NFPA68 at elevated static activation pressure was attributed to ignoring the compressibility and the choking phenomenon of high-speed fluid. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据