4.7 Article

SiOC coatings on yttria stabilized zirconia microspheres using a fluidized bed coating process

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 396, 期 -, 页码 158-166

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.10.043

关键词

SiOC; Fluidized bed coating; Microsphere; Pyrolysis; Rheology; Phase

资金

  1. Office of Nuclear Energy of Department of Energy [DE-NE0008807]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, defect-free SiOC coatings were prepared on yttria stabilized zirconia (YSZ) microspheres by a fluidized bed coating process. The impact regime diagram constructed demonstrated that the coating mechanisms were collision/impact. Two-step pyrolysis in Ar achieved complete coating layers, which were comprised of SiOC, SiO2, SiC, and graphite, providing a new method for producing SiOC coatings on micron spheres for the application of nuclear TRISO fuel particles.
In this study, defect-free SiOC coatings were prepared on yttria stabilized zirconia (YSZ) microspheres by a fluid-ized bed coating process. Effects of the rheological properties of the coating solution on the coating process were elucidated. An impact regime diagram was constructed, which demonstrated that the coating mechanisms were collision/impact. During the fluidized bed coating, longer spouted time resulted in wider dispersion, longer residence time, and more circulatory motion of particles; the fluid distributed more uniformly throughout the column, as demonstrated in our Multiphase Flow with Interface eXchange (MFiX) simulations. Two-step pyrolysis in Ar achieved complete coating layers, which were comprised of SiOC, SiO2, SiC, and graphite. The two stage mass loss during the pyrolysis corresponded to simultaneous reactions due to depolymerization and hydrocarbon loss from 400 to 600 degrees C. Carbon cluster size in the pyrolyzed samples was calculated to be 25 +/- 2 angstrom. This work provides a new method for producing SiOC coatings on micron spheres, with nuclear TRISO fuel particles as the application. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据