4.7 Article

Morphology and position measurement of irregular opaque particle with digital holography of side scattering

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 394, 期 -, 页码 384-393

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.08.065

关键词

Digital holography; Side scattering; Irregular particle; Morphology; Speckle; Moire effect

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52006193]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LQ19E060010]
  3. National Science and Technology Major Project [2017-V-0016-0069]
  4. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2020YFA0405700, 2020YFB0606200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Digital holography of side scattering is applied for measuring morphology and 3D position of pulverized coal particles. The holographic recording is modeled and verified by experiments. This technique has an advantage in identifying irregular particle morphological and surface features simultaneously.
Morphology measurement is essential for a better understanding of irregular particle dynamics. Digital holography of side scattering is applied to measure the morphology and 3D position of pulverized coal particles. The digital holographic recording of particle side scattering is modelled and the formula is verified by experiments. A side scattering holography system is established to record the hologram of pulverized coal particles. The hologram of particles with several scatterers has uneven chirp fringes which is mainly influenced by scatterer shape, while the hologram of particles with multiple scatterers is a superposition of single scatterer fringes with a speckle background which is influenced by both scatterer shape and location. The Moire pattern which appears easily in digital holography of side scattering is also analyzed. The proposed technique is validated by in-line holography and is proven to have an advantage in the identification of irregular particle morphological and surface features simultaneously. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据