4.7 Article

Sedimentation effects on particle position and inertial deposition in 90° circular bends

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 393, 期 -, 页码 722-733

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.07.072

关键词

Particle deposition; Sedimentation; Pipe bend; Micron particles; CFD; Computational fluid dynamics

资金

  1. Deakin University startup funds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A comprehensive analysis was conducted on the sedimentation effects of micron particles in 90 degrees circular pipe bends in laminar pipe flows, resulting in changes in particle deposition locations and upstream particle positions, with gravity being one of the influencing factors.
Laminar fluid-particle flows in bend geometries are present in many industrial, pharmaceutical, and biomedical applications. Particle deposition has been studied extensively; however, little attention has been paid to the effect of particle sedimentation on particle position and deposition in different pipe geometry combinations. This study presented a comprehensive analysis of sedimentation effects on particle flow behaviour in 90 degrees circular pipe bends of micron particles in laminar pipe flows. Pipe geometry combinations consisted of eight pipe diameters, nine bend radii, and 30 particle diameters in a range of 1 to 100 mu m. The results demonstrated the locations of particles that sedimented to the bottom half of the straight pipe section, and the particle positions upstream from the pipe bend entrance, which was no longer in a fully developed profile. These new locations represent the effects of gravity, pulling the particles down. While obtaining these positions can be found through CFD anal-ysis, we proposed an analytical solution to predict the particle trajectory from different release locations that would help to identify the initial particle distribution at locations upstream to the bend, to obviate the need for long upstream straight pipe sections in the CFD analysis. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据