4.7 Article

Size distribution monitoring for chemical mechanical polishing slurries: An intercomparison of electron microscopy, dynamic light scattering, and differential mobility analysis

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 396, 期 -, 页码 395-405

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.10.045

关键词

Chemical-mechanical polishing slurry; Differential mobility analysis; Size distribution measurement; Dynamic light scattering

资金

  1. Kanomax FMT Inc..
  2. NSF [DMR-2011401, ECCS-2025124]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aerosol technique, differential mobility analysis (LNS), is found to be more repeatable and accurate in characterizing CMP slurries compared to dynamic light scattering (DLS). LNS not only captures multimodal size distributions but also provides more precise information on the size distribution of slurry particles.
In chemical mechanical planarization (CMP), a particle slurry is used in polishing semiconductor wafers. Key to CMP performance is the size distribution of the particles. We evaluate the potential of an aerosol technique, namely differential mobility analysis (in a liquid nanoparticle sizer, LNS, system) to characterize size distributions of CMP slurries. LNS measurements are compared to size distributions inferred from electron microscopy (SEM), and dynamic light scattering (DLS). LNS measurements are more repeatable than DLS measurements, and for 4 silica slurries, LNS distributions are in better agreement with SEM measurements than DLS. We find also that the LNS can quantify multimodal size distributions. For non-silica slurries, LNS, DLS, and SEM measurements have geometric mean diameters which can vary from another by 10 nm or more. However, because each measurement type is internally consistent, the combination of LNS and DLS, which are automated, yields augmented information on slurry properties. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据