4.7 Article

Cleaning and disinfection of transport crates for poultry - comparison of four treatments at slaughter plant

期刊

POULTRY SCIENCE
卷 101, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101521

关键词

Campylobacter; transport crate; poultry; cleaning; disinfection

资金

  1. Swedish Farmers' Foundation for Agricultural Research [O-18-20-158]
  2. Ivar and Elsa Sandberg Foundation
  3. LivsID (food science-related industry PhD-program) - Swedish Government [2017/03895]
  4. SLU [SLU.ua.2017.1.1.1-2416]
  5. Vinnova [2017-03895] Funding Source: Vinnova

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the effectiveness of the disinfection procedure currently used in a large slaughter plant in Sweden. The combination of chemical disinfectant and hot air drying was found to be the most effective treatment in reducing the presence and amount of bacteria. However, this treatment is energy-consuming and would require technical changes, increasing operating costs.
Transport crates for poultry can contribute to the spread of pathogens, with those of public health interest, for example, Campylobacter, being of particular importance. A strict cleaning procedure and use of an effective disinfection method for transport equipment are thus important to avoid introduction of Campylobacter to chicken and poultry farms, particularly during flock thinning. This study evaluated the efficacy of the disinfection procedure currently in use at one of the largest slaughter plants in Sweden and compared the effects with those of other disinfection methods. The evaluation was based on treatment ability to reduce the presence and amount of indicator bacteria belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae and total aerobic bacteria. In 4 trials, sodium hypochlorite, peracetic acid, and drying with hot air, with or without sodium hypochlorite for final disinfection, were compared. The analysis was based on 40 cotton swab samples taken in each treatment, 20 after the soaking stage and 20 after the final disinfection step. The results showed that use of a chemical disinfectant in combination with drying with hot air (dehumidifier) was the most effective treatment, with an average reduction of 3.4 log for total aerobic bacteria and 3.8 log for Enterobacteriaceae. Since all crates treated with hot air were dry, transport conditions for the birds also improved, particularly in cold weather. A disadvantage is that this treatment is energy-consuming and would require substantial technical changes to the current cleaning process, increasing operating costs at the slaughter plant. However, considering the contribution of improved crate cleaning to overall hygiene control within the poultry supply chain and the beneficial effect on animal welfare, the costs may be justified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据