4.5 Article

Graphene oxide/chitosan nano-coating with ultrafast fire-alarm response and flame-retardant property

期刊

POLYMERS FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES
卷 33, 期 3, 页码 795-806

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pat.5556

关键词

chitosan; fire-warning response; flame retardant; graphene oxide; layer-by-layer self-assembly

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2021III037JC]
  2. Key Research and Development Project of Hubei Province [2020BCB077]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51774182]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20201030]
  5. Safety Production Special Fund Technology Project of Hubei Province [KJ2X202007004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By using layer-by-layer self-assembly technology, an intelligent nano-coating was constructed on melamine foam, which significantly improved the flame retardancy and thermal stability of the material. The nano-coating also enabled super-fast fire response with a continuous alarm time of up to 1280 seconds. This study provides a novel idea for the application of bio-based nano-coating in fire early response and warning systems.
Using layer-by-layer self-assembly technology, an intelligent nano-coating was constructed on melamine foam (MF) by electrostatic interactions between chitosan (CS) molecules and graphene oxide (GO) nano-sheets. According to the principle that GO is quickly reduced to reduced GO under high temperature, a fast fire-warning network can be constructed. Due to the protective effect of nano-coating constructed on MF, the thermal stability and flame retardancy of melamine composite foams are improved. As the nano-coating self-assembly layer increases to 20, its flame-response time is only 3 s, and the continuous alarm time is as high as 1280 s. These indicate that the prepared GO-CS composite foam possesses excellent flame retardancy and super-fast fire response. This study provides a novel idea for the application of bio-based nano-coating in the fire early response and warning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据