4.5 Article

Morphology evolution and mechanical property enhancement of linear low-density polyethylene by adding disentangled ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene

期刊

POLYMERS FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES
卷 33, 期 4, 页码 1047-1056

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pat.5577

关键词

compatibility; linear low-density polyethylene; mechanical properties; rheological properties; ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene

资金

  1. General Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [21776141]
  2. Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of Ningbo [202003N4014]
  3. Opening Foundation from State Key Laboratory of Polyolefins [SKLLCTP-201803]
  4. Talent Project of Zhejiang Association for Science and Technology [2018YCGC014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research found that miscible blends of UHMWPE and LLDPE can be obtained with a small addition amount of UHMWPE, and the mechanical properties of the blends are improved through the co-crystallization of UHMWPE, leading to significant increases in impact strength, breaking elongation, Young's modulus, and tensile strength when the addition amount of UHMWPE is 5.0 wt%.
Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) with different ratios were melt-blended in an internal mixer. Results of rheological tests and scanning electron microscopy indicate that the blends are well miscible in the range of small addition amount of UHMWPE. The content of UHMWPE is suggested to be less than 5.0 wt%, to guarantee good compatibility of biphasic blends. Differential scanning calorimetry studies indicate that co-crystallization occurs between UHMWPE and LLDPE. The crystallinity increases with the increase of UHMWPE as a nucleating agent. As a result, an improvement in mechanical properties is achieved. When the addition amount of UHMWPE is 5.0 wt%, the impact strength, breaking elongation, Young's modulus, and tensile strength are significantly increased by 27%, 25%, 75%, and 21% respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据