4.4 Article

Measuring the impact of burn scarring on health-related quality of life: Development and preliminary content validation of the Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile (BBSIP) for children and adults

期刊

BURNS
卷 41, 期 7, 页码 1405-1419

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.05.021

关键词

Cicatrix; Hypertrophic; Outcome assessment; Quality of life; Patient reported outcomes; Health and wellbeing; Burns

资金

  1. Queensland Children's Medical Research Institute
  2. Central Queensland Hospital and Health Service
  3. Queensland Health, Health Practitioner Research Scheme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: No burn-scar specific, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measure exists. This study aimed to develop a patient-reported, evaluative HRQOL measure to assess the impact of burn scarring in children and adults. Method: Semi-structured interviews, content validation surveys, and cognitive interviews were used to develop and test content validity of a new measure - the Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile (BBSIP). Results: Participants comprised Australian adults (n = 23) and children (n = 19) with burn scarring; caregivers of children with burn scarring (n = 28); and international scar management experts (n = 14). Items distinct from other burn scar measures emerged. Four versions of the BBSIP were developed; one for children aged 8-18 years, one for adults, one for caregivers (as proxies for children aged less than 8-years), and one for caregivers of children aged 8-18 years. Preliminary content validity of the BBSIP was supported. Final items covered physical and sensory symptoms; emotional reactions; impact on social functioning and daily activities; impact of treatment; and environmental factors. Conclusion: The BBSIP was developed to assess burn-scar specific HRQOL and will be available at http://www.coolburns.com.au under a creative commons license. Further testing is underway. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据