4.7 Article

Effects of a novel chitosan based macromolecule antioxidant COS-GMMP on the thermo-oxidative aging of styrene-butadiene rubber/silica composites

期刊

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
卷 195, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2021.109813

关键词

Rubber composites; Chitosan; Macromolecule antioxidant; Thermo-oxidative aging

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51973062]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a chitosan-based macromolecule antioxidant (COS-GMMP) was synthesized and its effects on the aging behavior of SBR/silica composites were investigated. The results showed that COS-GMMP exhibited superior performance in improving the thermal-oxidative aging resistance, stability, and solvent extraction resistance of the composites compared to the low molecule antioxidant GM.
A chitosan based macromolecule antioxidant (COS-GMMP) was prepared by using chitosan (COS), 2-tert-butyl-6-(3-tert-butyl-2-hydroxy-5-methylphenyl) methyl-4-methylp-henyl acrylate (antioxidant GM) and 3-mercaptopropionic acid (MPA) via Michael addition reaction and acylation reaction. The chemical structure of COS-GMMP was confirmed by H-1 NMR, C-13 NMR, FTIR and elemental analysis. The anti-aging behavior of styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR)/silica with COS-GMMP, as well as the low molecule antioxidant GM, was systematically investigated by the accelerated thermal aging tests, oxidation induction time (OIT), thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA) and hot water extraction experiments. The results revealed that COS-GMMP significantly improved the thermo-oxidative aging resistance, thermal-oxidative stability and solvent extraction resistance of SBR/silica composites more effectively than the antioxidant GM. The preeminent anti-oxidative ability of COS-GMMP for SBR/silica composites was attributed to not only the synergistic antioxidative effect among hindered phenol, amide and thioether groups, but also its high molecular weight. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据