4.7 Article

Short-term creep properties and creep model of wood-plastic composites

期刊

POLYMER COMPOSITES
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pc.26422

关键词

creep experimental test; Findley model; short-term creep properties; wood-plastic composites

资金

  1. Boutique Project of Social Science Applied Research of Jiangsu Province of China [19SYC-133]
  2. General Project of Philosophy and Social Sciences of Jiangsu Province of China [2020SJA0256]
  3. Youth Project of Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK20190796]
  4. Sentai WPC Group Co., Ltd
  5. Young Scholars Support Project of Nanjing University of Finance Economics
  6. Educational Reform Project of Nanjing University of Finance Economics [JGY19067]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focused on investigating the mechanical properties of wood-plastic composites (WPC) produced through a two-step extrusion process. It was found that different stress levels had varying effects on the creep behavior of WPC, with higher stress levels leading to brittle fractures more quickly. The Findley model was able to predict creep behavior at different stress levels, while the fractional-order model showed the highest fitting degree for high-stress levels.
Wood-plastic composites (WPC) were produced by a two-step extrusion process, and the mechanical properties like strength, elastic modulus, and Poisson's ratio of WPC were investigated. Twenty-four hours uniaxial tensile and compressive creep experimental tests under four stress levels of 15%, 30%, 45%, and 60% were completed. The results show that whether tensile or compressive creep, 15% and 30% stress levels are low-stress levels and 60% is high. When the stress level is 60%, brittle fracture occurs in 2.6 h for the tensile creep test, while it arises in 16.6 h for the compressive experiment. The Findley model can predict the creep behavior of WPC at high, medium, and low-stress levels, and the fractional-order model has the highest fitting degree for the creep properties at high-stress levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据