4.7 Article

Influence of yarn structure and coating on the mechanical performance of continuous viscose fiber/epoxy composites

期刊

POLYMER COMPOSITES
卷 43, 期 2, 页码 1012-1021

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pc.26430

关键词

biofibers; composites; mechanical properties; structure-property relations

资金

  1. Austria Biorefinery Centre Tulln [K3-F-712/001-2017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that the crimp of yarns had a significant impact on the strength properties of composite specimens, with a higher crimp ratio leading to decreased performance. Applying prestress to crimped yarns was proven to be an effective way to achieve straight alignment in the loading direction.
The present study investigated the effect of selected structural parameters on the mechanical performance of regenerated cellulose composites. The experimental setup comprised continuous viscose (rayon) yarns embedded in a matrix of epoxy resin. Mechanical and microscopic characterizations involved comparing the following: yarns consisting of untwisted filaments and twisted warp and weft yarns taken from a plain weave fabric, yarns with and without avivage (fiber finish), as well as yarns with and without an acrylic coating. During the epoxy treatment, samples were either prestressed or laid horizontally to preserve the original yarn structure. Tensile tests revealed that yarn crimp had a significant impact on the strength properties of composite specimens, a higher crimp ratio leading to a decrease in performance. Applying prestress to crimped yarns has proven to be an effective way to enable straight alignment in the loading direction, which is essential for the design of stiffness- and strength-optimized yarn composites. Unlike an avivage, which did not markedly affect the mechanical properties of composite yarns, the application of an acrylic coating prior to resin impregnation was found to provide significantly increased extensibility and more ductile fracture behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据