4.7 Review

Acoustic performance of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites: Influencing factors, future scope, challenges, and applications

期刊

POLYMER COMPOSITES
卷 43, 期 3, 页码 1221-1237

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pc.26455

关键词

applications; future outlook and challenges; natural fibers; noise pollution; processing methods; reinforcement architecture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Urbanization and industrial development necessitate effective control of noise pollution for a pleasant living atmosphere; synthetic fiber materials offer good acoustic performance but come with a high cost and environmental impact; natural fibers serve as a cost-effective and environmentally friendly alternative to synthetic fibers in terms of acoustic properties; various factors, such as processing methods, reinforcement architecture, fiber diameter, laminate thickness, and density, influence the acoustic behavior of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites.
Noise pollution caused by urbanization and industrial development must be effectively controlled to provide a pleasant living atmosphere. Different synthetic fiber materials have good acoustic performance, yet synthetic fiber materials have a high cost and have adverse effect on the environment. Natural fibers are a good alternative to synthetic fibers in terms of acoustic properties and they are also less expensive and have less environmental impact. Several factors affects the acoustic behavior of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites (NFRPCs). The present article focuses on the effect of different processing methods, reinforcement architecture, fiber diameter, laminate thickness and density on the acoustic performance of NFRPCs. Reinforcement architecture has been proved to be the best option in order to tailor the various acoustic properties of the composite laminates without even changing other physical properties. The challenges, future scope and potential applications of natural fibers in acoustic applications (home theaters, offices, cinema halls, automobiles, etc.) have also been discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据