4.5 Article

Innovation of high-performance adsorbent based on modified gelatin for wastewater treatment

期刊

POLYMER BULLETIN
卷 79, 期 12, 页码 11217-11233

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00289-022-04079-4

关键词

Gelatin; Hydrogel; Malachite green dye; Swellability; Adsorption isotherm

资金

  1. STDF (Egypt) [27777]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, high-efficient novel anionic adsorbent hydrogels were synthesized via free-radical polymerization and their properties were examined using various analysis techniques. The results demonstrated that the prepared hydrogels exhibited excellent swelling and adsorption capacities, making them effective for dye removal in water.
Wastewater treatment is one of the most interesting fields nowadays, especially removal of synthetic dyes from aqueous solution. For example, malachite green is considered as one the serious cationic dyes because cause tremendous damage to the human health then a series of dangerous diseases. Herein, we reported the synthesis of high-efficient novel anionic adsorbent hydrogels as gelatin-grafted-poly(acrylamide-co-itaconic acid) via free-radical polymerization by using methylenebisacrylamide, MBA, as crosslinking agent. The prepared modified gelatin hydrogels were detected via several analysis techniques: FTIR, XRD, and SEM, and thermal stability was studied by TGA technique as well. Moreover, the swellability of prepared hydrogel was examined and the data were found that maximum swelling rate % was 911% at optimum preparation conditions: 0.3 M of acrylamide and itaconic acid, 2.5 h, 5% (w/w%) of MBA, and temperature was 60 degrees C. Additionally, the maximum adsorption malachite green capacity by grafted gelatin hydrogels was measured as 93.5% (166.7 mg/g) in basic pH of 50 mL of MG dye solution (125 ppm) using 50 mg of hydrogels at 30 degrees C for 60 min. The adsorption isotherm models such as Langmuir and Freundlich for capture of dye was examined and results were well fitted with Langmuir model (R-2 = 0.9923).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据