4.5 Article

Synthesis and properties of poly(silylene bis(ethynylphenoxy)diphenylsulfone)

期刊

POLYMER BULLETIN
卷 80, 期 1, 页码 349-363

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00289-022-04102-8

关键词

Poly(silylene arylacetylene) resins with aromatic ether structure; Bis(ethynylphenoxy) diphenylsulfone; Heat-resistant resins; High-performance resin for advanced composite

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poly(silylene arylacetylene) resins with good mechanical properties and excellent heat resistance were synthesized and their structures and properties were characterized. The study found that the substituents on the main chain of the resin had slight effects on its thermal properties but significantly affected its processing and mechanical properties. Among them, the resin with phenyl substituent showed the best processability and mechanical performance.
Poly(silylene arylacetylene) resins have good mechanical properties and excellent heat resistance. In this paper, bis(ethynylphenoxy) diphenylsulfone (BEPS) was synthesized by Williamson and Sonogashira reactions. Furthermore, a series of poly(silylene ethynylenephenoxy diphenylsulfone) (PSEF) resins were synthesized from BEPS and various silanes with different substituents (-H, -CH3, -C6H5, -CH=CH2) through Grignard reagent method. The structures and properties of synthesized resins were characterized. The properties of carbon fiber-reinforced PSEF (T300/PSEF) composites were measured. The results indicate that the PSEF resins demonstrate high mechanical properties with excellent heat resistance and the substituents on the main chain of PSEF resin would slightly affect the thermal properties of the resin, but greatly affect the processing and mechanical properties. The PSEF with phenyl substituent (P-PSEF) shows the best processability and mechanical performance with a T-d5 of 437 degrees C. The T300/P-PSEF composite has a flexural strength of 620.9 MPa at room temperature and no glass transition in the range of rt similar to 450 degrees C. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据