4.7 Article

X-ray study of Poly(vinyl Alcohol)-Iodine complex prepared from the dilute iodine solution as a hint to know the inner structure of polarizer

期刊

POLYMER
卷 233, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2021.124180

关键词

Poly(vinyl alcohol)-iodine complex; Crystal structure; Polarizer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals that PVA forms different iodine complexes in solutions with varying concentrations, with a unique structure identified as form IV. Through X-ray diffraction, resonance Raman data, and theoretical calculations, the specific structure of form IV was determined, and transformation mechanisms for various complexes were proposed. Additionally, the similarity between the X-ray diffraction pattern of form IV and a commercial polarizer suggests insights into the inner structure of the polarizer.
As well known, poly (vinyl alcohol) (PVA) forms the various kinds of iodine complexes (forms I, II and III) when the sample is immersed in the KI/I-2 aqueous solution of various iodine concentrations of 0.1-3 M. By immersing the PVA sample in more dilute solution of 0.001-0.05 M, a new X-ray diffraction pattern has been found (form IV). The quantitative analysis of the X-ray diffraction pattern combined with the resonance Raman data and the density functional theoretical calculation allowed us to derive the concrete structure model of form IV. The vertically-arrayed linear I-5(-) ions are surrounded by the 6 PVA chains of planar-zigzag conformation to form the cylindrical structure. These cylinders are gathered together to form the hexagonal lattice. On the basis of the thus-determined structural information of a series of complexes, the transformation mechanism has been proposed for forms IV, I, II and III. Besides, the X-ray diffraction pattern of form IV was found to be similar to that measured for a commercial polarizer. The inner structure of the polarizer has been discussed concretely using the thus-revealed aggregation structure of form IV.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据