4.6 Article

Preparation of optimized concanavalin A-conjugated Dynabeads® magnetic beads for CUT&Tag

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 16, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259846

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [17K15392, 20H00446]
  2. JST ERATO [JPMJER1901]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K15392, 20H00446] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epigenome research uses various methods to locate proteins like transcription factors and histone modifications. The CUT&Tag method, employing a Protein-A Tn5 transposase fusion protein, is important for chromatin accessibility. Dynabeads, particularly MyOne-T1, show improved suspendability and sensitivity for CUT&Tag assays.
Epigenome research has employed various methods to identify the genomic location of proteins of interest, such as transcription factors and histone modifications. A recently established method called CUT&Tag uses a Protein-A Tn5 transposase fusion protein, which cuts the genome and inserts adapter sequences nearby the target protein. Throughout most of the CUT&Tag procedure, cells are held on concanavalin A (con A)-conjugated magnetic beads. Proper holding of cells would be decisive for the accessibility of Tn5 to the chromatin, and efficacy of the procedure of washing cells. However, BioMag (R) Plus ConA magnetic beads, used in the original CUT&Tag protocol, often exhibit poor suspendability and severe aggregation. Here, we compared the BioMag beads and Dynabeads (R) magnetic particles of which conjugation of con A was done by our hands, and examined the performance of these magnetic beads in CUT&Tag. Among tested, one of the Dynabeads, MyOne-T1, kept excessive suspendability in a buffer even after overnight incubation. Furthermore, the MyOne-T1 beads notably improved the sensitivity in CUT&Tag assay for H3K4me3. In conclusion, the arrangement and the selection of MyOne-T1 refine the suspendability of beads, which improves the association of chromatin with Tn5, which enhances the sensitivity in CUT&Tag assay.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据