4.7 Article

Establishing the Family of Diruthenium Water Oxidation Catalysts Based on the Bis(bipyridyl)pyrazolate Ligand System

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 55, 期 5, 页码 2508-2521

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b02869

关键词

-

资金

  1. State of Lower Saxony (International Ph.D. program Catalysis for Sustainable Synthesis, CaSuS, fellowship)
  2. MINECO [CTQ2013-49075-R, SEV-2013-0319, CTQ-2014-52974-REDC, ENE2014-52280-REDT]
  3. DFG [Me 1313/9-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A bis(bipyridyl)pyrazolate ((Me)bbp(-)) has recently been introduced as a rugged dinucleating, bis(tridentate) ligand for the formation of efficient diruthenium water oxidation catalysts (J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 24-27). Now, detailed protocols for the synthesis of a whole family of such dinuclear ruthenium complexes [{Ru(pyR(2))(2)}(2)(mu-(R1)bbp)-(X,Y)](2+) based on the bis(bipyridyl)pyrazolate scaffold are reported. The isolation of a synthetic key intermediate allowed the straightforward introduction of different pyridines as axial ligands. Thereby, a set of complexes with different substituents at the pyrazolate backbone (R-1 = Br, H, Me), different pyridines as axial ligand (R-2 = H, NMe2, SO3), and different (non)bridging units in the in,in-position (X,Y = Cl, H2O, OAc) has been prepared and thoroughly characterized. Complexes of the type [{Ru(pyR(2))(2)},(mu-(R1)bbp)(mu-OAc)](2+), with an exogenous acetato bridge, have been used as catalyst precursors in catalytic water oxidation experiments with a sacrificial oxidant. The effect of substitution on the pyrazole core of the (R1)bbp(-) ligand as well as on the pyridine ligands on both electrochemistry and catalytic activity has been systematically investigated. The catalyst stability, reflected by the turnover number, is crucially determined by the substituent at the pyrazolate ligand (R-1 = Me > H > Br). In contrast, the axial pyridine ligands modulate the rate of the catalytic process, expressed by the initial turnover frequency (R-2 = H > NMe2H+).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据