4.6 Article

Identification and verification of grain shape QTLs by SNP array in rice

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 16, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260133

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [32001529]
  2. Hubei Academy of Agricultural Science Foundation [2021NKYJJ02]
  3. Key R&D program of Hubei Province [2020BBA031]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2020A1515011390]
  5. Hubei Key Laboratory of Food Crop Germplasm and Genetic Improvement Foundation [2019lzjj02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Grain shape plays a significant role in the economic value and yield of rice, with research identifying multiple QTLs in the rice genome, particularly the major QTL cluster qGS7 showing strong genetic effects. Investigating the impact of different QTLs on grain shape and size has provided insights and approaches for producing hybrid high-yield rice varieties.
Grain shape strongly influences the economic value and grain yield of rice. Thus, identifying quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for grain shape has been a longstanding goal in rice genetic research and breeding programs. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers are ubiquitous in the rice genome and are more abundant and evenly distributed on the 12 rice chromosomes than traditional markers. An F-2 population was genotyped using the RICE6K SNP array to elucidate the mechanisms governing grain shape. Thirty-five QTLs for grain shape were detected on 11 of 12 chromosomes over 2 years. The major QTL cluster qGS7was detected in both years and displayed strong genetic effects on grain length and width, showing consistency with GL7/GW7. Some minor QTLs were also detected, and the effects of four QTLs on seed size were then validated using BC1F6 populations with residual heterozygous lines in each QTL region. Our findings provide insights into the molecular basis of grain shape as well as additional resources and approaches for producing hybrid high-yield rice varieties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据