Holistic processing of faces and words predicts reading accuracy and speed in dyslexic readers

We compared the performance of dyslexic and typical readers on two perceptual tasks, the Vanderbilt Holistic Face Processing Task and the Holistic Word Processing Task. Both yield a metric of holistic processing that captures the extent to which participants automatically attend to information that is spatially nearby but irrelevant to the task at hand. Our results show, for the first time, that holistic processing of faces is comparable in dyslexic and typical readers but that dyslexic readers show greater holistic processing of words. Remarkably, we show that these metrics predict the performance of dyslexic readers on a standardized reading task, with more holistic processing in both tasks associated with higher accuracy and speed. In contrast, a more holistic style on the words task predicts less accurate reading of both words and pseudowords for typical readers. We discuss how these findings may guide our conceptualization of the visual deficit in dyslexia.

Automated summary

This study compared the performance of dyslexic and typical readers on tasks measuring holistic face processing and holistic word processing. The results showed that dyslexic readers exhibited greater holistic processing of words than typical readers, while face processing abilities were similar. Additionally, the study found that more holistic processing in both tasks predicted higher accuracy and speed for dyslexic readers, but lower accuracy for typical readers in word reading.