4.6 Article

Integrating additional factors into the TNM staging for cutaneous melanoma by machine learning

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 16, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257949

关键词

-

资金

  1. grant Using Dendrograms to Create Prognostic Systems for Cancer - John P. Murtha Cancer Center Research Program
  2. grant Creating Prognostic Systems for Cancer - John P. Murtha Cancer Center Research Program
  3. grant Four Diamonds Fund from Penn State University - Penn State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces machine learning as a novel tool to integrate additional prognostic factors into the TNM staging system for more accurate risk classification and survival prediction in patients with cutaneous melanoma. By utilizing the Ensemble Algorithm for Clustering Cancer Data (EACCD), a more advanced prognostic system was developed that improved patient stratification and survival prediction accuracy. The integration of additional factors separated favorable from unfavorable clinical outcomes, enhancing cohort selection for clinical trials and treatment management.
Background Integrating additional factors into the TNM staging system is needed for more accurate risk classification and survival prediction for patients with cutaneous melanoma. In the present study, we introduce machine learning as a novel tool that incorporates additional prognostic factors to improve the current TNM staging system. Methods and findings Cancer-specific survival data for cutaneous melanoma with at least a 5 years follow-up were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program of the National Cancer Institute and split into the training set (40,781 cases) and validation set (5,390 cases). Five factors were studied: the primary tumor (T), regional lymph nodes (N), distant metastasis (M), age (A), and sex (S). The Ensemble Algorithm for Clustering Cancer Data (EACCD) was applied to the training set to generate prognostic groups. Utilizing only T, N, and M, a basic prognostic system was built where patients were stratified into 10 prognostic groups with well-separated survival curves, similar to 10 AJCC stages. These 10 groups had a significantly higher accuracy in survival prediction than 10 stages (C-index = 0.7682 vs 0.7643; increase in C-index = 0.0039, 95% CI = (0.0032, 0.0047); p-value = 7.2x10(-23)). Nevertheless, a positive association remained between the EACCD grouping and the AJCC staging (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient = 0.8316; p-value = 4.5x10(-13)). With additional information from A and S, a more advanced prognostic system was established using the training data that stratified patients into 10 groups and further improved the prediction accuracy (C-index = 0.7865 vs 0.7643; increase in C-index = 0.0222, 95% CI = (0.0191, 0.0254); p-value = 8.8x10(-43) ). Both internal validation using the training set and temporal validation using the validation set showed good stratification and a high predictive accuracy of the prognostic systems. Conclusions The EACCD allows additional factors to be integrated into the TNM to create a prognostic system that improves patient stratification and survival prediction for cutaneous melanoma. This integration separates favorable from unfavorable clinical outcomes for patients and improves both cohort selection for clinical trials and treatment management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据