相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。Exploring the Gray Area: Similarities and Differences in Questionable Research Practices (QRPs) Across Main Areas of Research
Tine Ravn et al.
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS (2021)
Detecting publication selection bias through excess statistical significance
T. D. Stanley et al.
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2021)
An Excess of Positive Results: Comparing the Standard Psychology Literature With Registered Reports
Anne M. Scheel et al.
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2021)
Heterogeneity of Research Results: A New Perspective From Which to Assess and Promote Progress in Psychological Science
Audrey Helen Linden et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2021)
Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects
Amanda Kvarven et al.
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2020)
A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses
Dean Langan et al.
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2019)
Random-EffectsMeta-analysis Summarizing Evidence With Caveats
Stylianos Serghiou et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2019)
The Effect of Publication Bias on the Q Test and Assessment of Heterogeneity
Hilde E. M. Augusteijn et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS (2019)
The Unappreciated Heterogeneity of Effect Sizes: Implications for Power, Precision, Planning of Research, and Replication
David A. Kenny et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS (2019)
Correcting for Bias in Psychology: A Comparison of Meta-Analytic Methods
Evan C. Carter et al.
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2019)
The Meaningfulness of Effect Sizes in Psychological Research: Differences Between Sub-Disciplines and the Impact of Potential Biases
Thomas Schaefer et al.
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY (2019)
A re-evaluation of fixed effect(s) meta-analysis
Kenneth Rice et al.
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY (2018)
Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution
Hannah Fraser et al.
PLOS ONE (2018)
What Meta-Analyses Reveal About the Replicability of Psychological Research
T. D. Stanley et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN (2018)
Comparative performance of heterogeneity variance estimators in meta-analysis: a review of simulation studies
Dean Langan et al.
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2017)
Meta-assessment of bias in science
Daniele Fanelli et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2017)
Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in meta-analysis
Areti Angeliki Veroniki et al.
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2016)
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Alexander A. Aarts et al.
SCIENCE (2015)
Publication Bias in Psychology: A Diagnosis Based on the Correlation between Effect Size and Sample Size
Anton Kuehberger et al.
PLOS ONE (2014)
You Cannot Step Into the Same River Twice: When Power Analyses Are Optimistic
Blakeley B. McShane et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2014)
Investigating Variation in Replicability A Many Labs'' Replication Project
Richard A. Klein et al.
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2014)
P-Curve: A Key to the File-Drawer
Uri Simonsohn et al.
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL (2014)
Estimating heterogeneity variance in meta-analysis
Andrew L. Rukhin
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY (2013)
US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research
Daniele Fanelli et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2013)
On Estimating Residual Heterogeneity in Random-Effects Meta-Regression: A Comparative Study
Thammarat Panityakul et al.
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL THEORY AND APPLICATIONS (2013)
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
Leslie K. John et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)
Publication Bias in Psychological Science: Prevalence, Methods for Identifying and Controlling, and Implications for the Use of Meta-Analyses
Christopher J. Ferguson et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS (2012)
False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant
Joseph P. Simmons et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2011)
Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
Wolfgang Viechtbauer
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE (2010)
Cross-National Patterns of Gender Differences in Mathematics: A Meta-Analysis
Nicole M. Else-Quest et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN (2010)
On the Assessment of Monte Carlo Error in Simulation-Based Statistical Analyses
Elizabeth Koehler et al.
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2009)
Fixed-versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: Model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results
Frank L. Schmidt et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY (2009)
Confidence intervals for the overall effect size in random-effects meta-analysis
Julio Sanchez-Meca et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS (2008)
Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: An update
Rebecca DerSimonian et al.
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS (2007)
Assessing the implications of publication bias for two popular estimates of between-study variance in meta-analysis
Dan Jackson
BIOMETRICS (2007)
The implications of publication bias for meta-analysis' other parameter
Dan Jackson
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2006)
Bias and efficiency of meta-analytic variance estimators in the random-effects model
W Viechtbauer
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS (2005)
Why most published research findings are false
JPA Ioannidis
PLOS MEDICINE (2005)
Simple heterogeneity variance estimation for meta-analysis
K Sidik et al.
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS (2005)
Towards a balanced social psychology: Causes, consequences, and cures for the problem-seeking approach to social behavior and cognition
JI Krueger et al.
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES (2004)
Improved tests for a random effects meta-regression with a single covariate
G Knapp et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2003)