4.6 Article

Heterogeneity estimates in a biased world

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Article Ethics

Exploring the Gray Area: Similarities and Differences in Questionable Research Practices (QRPs) Across Main Areas of Research

Tine Ravn et al.

Summary: This paper is the first systematic account of disciplinary similarities and differences in questionable research practices (QRPs), shedding light on the close connection between QRPs and distinct research practices within different areas of research.

SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS (2021)

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

Detecting publication selection bias through excess statistical significance

T. D. Stanley et al.

Summary: This study introduces and evaluates three tests for publication selection bias based on excess statistical significance (ESS), showing that these ESS tests often outperform the conventional Egger test for publication selection bias and the three-parameter selection model (3PSM).

RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2021)

Article Psychology

An Excess of Positive Results: Comparing the Standard Psychology Literature With Registered Reports

Anne M. Scheel et al.

Summary: Selective publishing of positive results may distort the evidence for scientific claims. A comparison between Registered Reports (RRs) and standard literature in psychology reveals a significant difference in the proportion of positive results, suggesting a reduction in publication bias and/or Type I error inflation in RR literature.

ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2021)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Heterogeneity of Research Results: A New Perspective From Which to Assess and Promote Progress in Psychological Science

Audrey Helen Linden et al.

Summary: Unexplained heterogeneity in research reflects a lack of understanding of the subject matter, with high levels found in meta-analyses in cognitive, organizational, and social psychology, while moderate levels were observed in close replications. A newly identified relationship between heterogeneity and effect size allows for predictions about expected levels, which has important implications for theory formulation and evaluation in psychology.

PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2021)

Article Psychology, Biological

Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects

Amanda Kvarven et al.

NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2020)

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses

Dean Langan et al.

RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2019)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Random-EffectsMeta-analysis Summarizing Evidence With Caveats

Stylianos Serghiou et al.

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2019)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

The Effect of Publication Bias on the Q Test and Assessment of Heterogeneity

Hilde E. M. Augusteijn et al.

PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS (2019)

Article Psychology

Correcting for Bias in Psychology: A Comparison of Meta-Analytic Methods

Evan C. Carter et al.

ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2019)

Article Social Sciences, Mathematical Methods

A re-evaluation of fixed effect(s) meta-analysis

Kenneth Rice et al.

JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY (2018)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution

Hannah Fraser et al.

PLOS ONE (2018)

Article Psychology

What Meta-Analyses Reveal About the Replicability of Psychological Research

T. D. Stanley et al.

PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN (2018)

Review Mathematical & Computational Biology

Comparative performance of heterogeneity variance estimators in meta-analysis: a review of simulation studies

Dean Langan et al.

RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2017)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Meta-assessment of bias in science

Daniele Fanelli et al.

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2017)

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in meta-analysis

Areti Angeliki Veroniki et al.

RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2016)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

Alexander A. Aarts et al.

SCIENCE (2015)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

You Cannot Step Into the Same River Twice: When Power Analyses Are Optimistic

Blakeley B. McShane et al.

PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2014)

Article Psychology, Social

Investigating Variation in Replicability A Many Labs'' Replication Project

Richard A. Klein et al.

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2014)

Article Psychology, Experimental

P-Curve: A Key to the File-Drawer

Uri Simonsohn et al.

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL (2014)

Article Statistics & Probability

Estimating heterogeneity variance in meta-analysis

Andrew L. Rukhin

JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY (2013)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research

Daniele Fanelli et al.

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2013)

Article Statistics & Probability

On Estimating Residual Heterogeneity in Random-Effects Meta-Regression: A Comparative Study

Thammarat Panityakul et al.

JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL THEORY AND APPLICATIONS (2013)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling

Leslie K. John et al.

PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)

Article Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package

Wolfgang Viechtbauer

JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE (2010)

Article Psychology

Cross-National Patterns of Gender Differences in Mathematics: A Meta-Analysis

Nicole M. Else-Quest et al.

PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN (2010)

Article Statistics & Probability

On the Assessment of Monte Carlo Error in Simulation-Based Statistical Analyses

Elizabeth Koehler et al.

AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2009)

Article Mathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications

Fixed-versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: Model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results

Frank L. Schmidt et al.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY (2009)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Confidence intervals for the overall effect size in random-effects meta-analysis

Julio Sanchez-Meca et al.

PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS (2008)

Article Medicine, Research & Experimental

Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: An update

Rebecca DerSimonian et al.

CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS (2007)

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

The implications of publication bias for meta-analysis' other parameter

Dan Jackson

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2006)

Article Education & Educational Research

Bias and efficiency of meta-analytic variance estimators in the random-effects model

W Viechtbauer

JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS (2005)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Why most published research findings are false

JPA Ioannidis

PLOS MEDICINE (2005)

Article Statistics & Probability

Simple heterogeneity variance estimation for meta-analysis

K Sidik et al.

JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS (2005)

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

Improved tests for a random effects meta-regression with a single covariate

G Knapp et al.

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2003)