4.6 Article

Perceptions, relationships, expectations, and challenges: Views of communication and research for scientific dissemination in Brazilian Federal Institutes

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 16, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258492

关键词

-

资金

  1. Federal Goiano Institute (IF Goiano), Brazil
  2. Research Group on Child and Adolescent Health (GPSaCA-www.gpsaca.com.br) of the IF Goiano-Campus Ceres

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research identified challenges in science communication in two Federal Institutes of Education in Brazil, with a lack of coordination between journalists, communicators, and researchers. Building better relationships, establishing a science communication plan, and overcoming internal barriers were highlighted as key challenges to be addressed. The results could inform science communication policies at institutional or even national levels.
Communicating Brazilian science still seems to be a challenge for journalists and researchers of public institutions of education and science. In this sense, this research aims to identify and analyze scientists' perceptions regarding the work of journalists, the relationship between these groups, the expectations, and the challenges of science communication in two Federal Institutes of Education in Brazil. We conducted a mixed study in the qualitative stage with the participation of 30 interviewees, and in the quantitative stage, journalists and researchers answered a questionnaire (n = 242). Our results indicated that the work of science communication is not carried out properly in both Institutes and that there is a lack of articulated work among both journalists, communicators, and researchers. The relationship between these groups needs to be built jointly. In this respect, the biggest challenges are to institutionalize science communication, establish a science communication plan, and overcome internal relationship barriers. Our results may underpin science communication policies and policies for scientific dissemination both institutional or even national levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据